PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.29%
Revenue growth similar to MTDR's 19.00%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
15.01%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MTDR's 69.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
132.99%
EBIT growth 50-75% of MTDR's 258.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
132.99%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of MTDR's 258.18%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
150.33%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MTDR's 167.79%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
150.21%
EPS growth at 75-90% of MTDR's 167.53%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
149.15%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of MTDR's 166.23%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above MTDR's 0.62%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above MTDR's 2.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.40%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
15.02%
OCF growth above 1.5x MTDR's 7.47%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
26.86%
FCF growth 50-75% of MTDR's 40.38%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-37.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 611.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
58.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 341.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 30.14%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-26.03%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 385.86%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
241.13%
Below 50% of MTDR's 573.88%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
62.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 16.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
124.29%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 180.25%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
152.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to MTDR's 141.14%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
52.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-86.16%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 94.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 89.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-54.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-90.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MTDR stands at 1448.12%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
19.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.56% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.52% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
40.60%
AR growth well above MTDR's 28.94%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 1.40%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
7.31%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 3.82%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.78%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.18%
SG&A growth well above MTDR's 34.20%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.