PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
89.93%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 66.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
309.76%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MTDR's 82.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
971.26%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MTDR's 92.36%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
971.26%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MTDR's 92.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
663.07%
Net income growth above 1.5x MTDR's 100.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
661.70%
EPS growth above 1.5x MTDR's 100.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
654.26%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MTDR's 100.58%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.08%
Share reduction while MTDR is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above MTDR's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
23.17%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
96.20%
Similar OCF growth to MTDR's 96.47%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
255.98%
FCF growth 50-75% of MTDR's 426.03%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
192.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1124.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
161.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 517.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
95.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 285.47%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
21.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 551.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
366.46%
Below 50% of MTDR's 815.01%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
59.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 371.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
152.43%
Below 50% of MTDR's 3014.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
210.19%
Below 50% of MTDR's 1137.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
333.70%
Below 50% of MTDR's 1016.47%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-51.25%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 190.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-35.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 141.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-37.58%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 43.76%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-75.07%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MTDR stands at 772609.01%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
245.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 245.88% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
174.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 174.91% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MTDR's 24.68%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 8.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
24.37%
1.25-1.5x MTDR's 17.16%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-15.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.