PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MTDR's 3.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.14%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MTDR's 3.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2020.00%
Negative EBIT growth while MTDR is at 9.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4550.00%
Negative operating income growth while MTDR is at 8.08%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-165.00%
Negative net income growth while MTDR stands at 11.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-165.22%
Negative EPS growth while MTDR is at 11.63%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-177.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MTDR is at 12.28%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.59%
Share reduction while MTDR is at 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MTDR's 1.02%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
1.61%
Dividend growth under 50% of MTDR's 23.64%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-14.41%
Negative OCF growth while MTDR is at 26.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-45.30%
Negative FCF growth while MTDR is at 231.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
10.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 719.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-10.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 152.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
19.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 67.58%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 359.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
53.88%
Below 50% of MTDR's 519.89%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.98%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 108.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
94.58%
Below 50% of MTDR's 381.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-137.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 77.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
34.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 9.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-38.35%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 238.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-1.32%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
112.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 135.15%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
19.47%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.47% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
224.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 224.25% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
48.27%
Below 50% of MTDR's 529.30%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
12.58%
Our AR growth while MTDR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MTDR's 2.14%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
-0.86%
We have a declining book value while MTDR shows 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.39%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MTDR's 54.54%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.