PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
79.55%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2863.56%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2863.56%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
66.67%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
67.35%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
67.35%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
58.98%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
58.98%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.87%
Dividend growth of 3.87% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.57%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-33.69%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-48.53%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.82%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-36.19%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.19%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.08%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.