PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.92%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.42%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.43%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.43%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-57.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-58.54%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-58.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.43%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.60%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
9.96%
Dividend growth of 9.96% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.22%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
12.87%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 147.32%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-38.83%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-38.83%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OBE stands at 179.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-38.83%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.55%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 155.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-60.55%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 172.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-60.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
79.25%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
79.25%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
79.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to OBE's 80.23%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.74%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.08%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.89%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
6.65%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.86%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.