PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.48%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.46%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
41.97%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
41.97%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
115.34%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.82%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
37.88%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
58.62%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
56.84%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-55.10%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
39.67%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.12%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 147.32%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-15.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OBE stands at 179.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.63%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-18.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE stands at 184.32%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-18.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is at 2764.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-18.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
87.71%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 155.92%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
87.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 172.18%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
87.71%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
17.01%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
17.01%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
17.01%
Below 50% of OBE's 80.23%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
4.83%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
4.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
4.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.76%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.02%
Inventory growth of 2.02% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.56%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-34.29%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.80%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.67%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.