PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.21%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-11.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.02%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.02%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
13.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
11.51%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-5.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.90%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
430.43%
Dividend growth of 430.43% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
98.00%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
91.59%
FCF growth 50-75% of OBE's 147.32%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
187.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
187.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to OBE's 179.84%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
187.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
791.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 184.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
791.79%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
791.79%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
135.24%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 155.92%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
135.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 172.18%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
135.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
197.22%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
197.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 344.68%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
197.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 80.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
93.57%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
93.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.57% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
93.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 93.57% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
26.01%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-52.34%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.93%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 3.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.40%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.22%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.