PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.24%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
31.24%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-45.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-45.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-101.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-101.90%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-101.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.67%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.89%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.25%
Dividend growth of 3.25% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
50.48%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.10%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 147.32%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
311.46%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
311.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 179.84%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
311.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1222.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 184.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1222.66%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1222.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-140.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 155.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-140.96%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 172.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-140.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
298.15%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
298.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 344.68%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
298.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 80.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
107.74%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
107.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
107.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-18.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-59.28%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.73%
75-90% of OBE's 3.41%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-0.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.80%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.