PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.20%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
21.97%
Gross profit growth of 21.97% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
42.63%
EBIT growth of 42.63% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
42.63%
Operating income growth of 42.63% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
1968.89%
Net income growth of 1968.89% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
2385.71%
EPS growth of 2385.71% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
2450.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 2450.00% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-19.18%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-18.90%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
86.34%
Dividend growth of 86.34% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-54.38%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-242.61%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
114.98%
10Y CAGR of 114.98% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
114.98%
5Y CAGR of 114.98% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
114.98%
3Y CAGR of 114.98% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
103.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 103.79% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
103.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 103.79% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
103.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 103.79% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
195.52%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 195.52% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
195.52%
Net income/share CAGR of 195.52% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
195.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 195.52% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
67.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 67.87% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
67.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 67.87% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
67.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 67.87% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
89.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
89.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
89.40%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
37.86%
AR growth of 37.86% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
103.35%
Inventory growth of 103.35% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.30%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
23.70%
BV/share growth of 23.70% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-8.94%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.18%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.