PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.15%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 26.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.37%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 32.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of OBE's 38.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth under 50% of OBE's 95.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-68.39%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 250.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-67.71%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 248.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-68.09%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 273.53%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.94%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.81%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.08%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
36.66%
OCF growth of 36.66% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
26.91%
FCF growth of 26.91% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
51.13%
10Y CAGR of 51.13% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
51.13%
5Y CAGR of 51.13% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
147.06%
3Y CAGR of 147.06% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.42%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 200.42% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-8.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-8.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
131.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 131.47% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
227.88%
Equity/share CAGR of 227.88% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
227.88%
Equity/share CAGR of 227.88% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
82.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 82.92% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.66% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
32.45%
AR growth well above OBE's 25.40%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
59.90%
Inventory growth of 59.90% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
10.94%
Asset growth above 1.5x OBE's 3.52%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.64%
Similar to OBE's 3.58%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
17.58%
Debt growth far above OBE's 35.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.77%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.