PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.06%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 40.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.02%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of OBE's 10.16%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
32.10%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 1.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
32.10%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-37.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-35.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-35.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.40%
Share reduction while OBE is at 42.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.46%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 41.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.04%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-28.82%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 91.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-59.97%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 133.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
55.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
55.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
168.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 29.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
393.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
393.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
640.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
364.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 75.75%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
364.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 75.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
164.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 75.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
457.61%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 17.40%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.37%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 9.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
39.43%
Inventory growth of 39.43% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.32%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.82%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.76%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.01%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.