Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x OBE's 1.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.97%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.

Operating income growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction while OBE is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 60.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 60.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 60.55%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.

Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.

Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.