PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.04%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.64%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-21.50%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.50%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-35.24%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 174.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.91%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 173.62%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 173.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.58%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-7.72%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
7.77%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
2.36%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.10%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-43.26%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 151.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
141.25%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
294.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
182.48%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
535.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
159.28%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
268.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
833.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
194.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
441.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 52.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
202.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 52.60%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
103.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 52.60%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
355.97%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 9.86%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
314.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 9.86%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.46%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
12.45%
Inventory growth of 12.45% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.01%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
16.95%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.17%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.