PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.30%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OBE's 6.53%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-17.94%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 6.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-40.26%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 3.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-40.26%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 3.66%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
15.45%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.59%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.73%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.25%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-3.02%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-507.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
352.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
436.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
139.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
469.32%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
599.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
162.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1390.71%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
694.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-34.46%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
460.83%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 42.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
379.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 42.95%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
126.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 42.95%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
961.77%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
912.89%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
408.06%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-2.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 7.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.74%
Inventory growth of 6.74% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.98%
Asset growth above 1.5x OBE's 1.46%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.26%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
31.58%
Debt growth far above OBE's 6.49%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.26%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.