PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.16%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 53.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-17.99%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 224.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-56.00%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 91.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-56.00%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 91.06%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-89.54%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 117.07%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-90.63%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 120.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-90.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 120.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 1.70%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
37.95%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 30.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
55.02%
FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 24.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
65.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
94.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
6.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-90.22%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-92.17%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-98.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
575.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 51.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
154.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 51.94%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
45.39%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
723.35%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
303.91%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
7.14%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.39%
Inventory growth of 2.39% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.58%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.91%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
59.39%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
SG&A growth well above OBE's 4.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.