PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-129.30%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
7.42%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
110.61%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
110.61%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2444.00%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2720.00%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2720.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-50.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-48.46%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 13.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-58.78%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 26.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-188.26%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-146.64%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-134.26%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
266.04%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
69.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-1.09%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
771.98%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-61.67%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
16.21%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
346.73%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 41.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
80.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 41.62%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
14.39%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
956.98%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
405.76%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
131.91%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-38.57%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-98.35%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-36.14%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-33.43%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-45.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.41%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.