PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-40.99%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 1.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-125.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-125.13%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 83.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-106.93%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 16.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-107.07%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 17.95%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-107.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 15.79%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.64%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-83.52%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
13.34%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-42.43%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-74.95%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
146.90%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-63.85%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-56.63%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-158.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-102.39%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-103.94%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
375.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 35.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
45.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 35.32%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
-15.25%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
956.80%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
208.71%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-0.47%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
8.11%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OBE's 24.52%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-50.00%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.71%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 3.16%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.13%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.57%
Debt shrinking faster vs. OBE's 9.38%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.11%
SG&A growth well above OBE's 4.35%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.