PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.22%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
145.91%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
94.03%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
94.03%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
16.06%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.00%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.03%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
80.98%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
318.67%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-26.89%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-81.46%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-73.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
232.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-47.72%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-56.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1358.85%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-234.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-5178.11%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-14.95%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OBE stands at 49.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-71.85%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
352.84%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-0.69%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-49.99%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-6.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 17.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-63.93%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.80%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.25%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.35%
Debt shrinking faster vs. OBE's 6.61%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.