PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.59%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 15.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
169.31%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
346.02%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 64.44%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
346.02%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
93.57%
Net income growth above 1.5x OBE's 20.90%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
93.61%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 19.39%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
93.61%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 21.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.03%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-37.22%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 85.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-117.36%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 152.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.67%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-71.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
244.02%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
136.69%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-66.16%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-47.37%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-159.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-107.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-112.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
24.14%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 41.38%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-74.10%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-67.48%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
908.15%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-0.47%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-0.02%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-4.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.11%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.57%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1198.04%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.