PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.96%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 13.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
39.42%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 128.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
855.56%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 97.57%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
855.56%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
146.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x OBE's 86.81%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
147.06%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 86.85%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
147.06%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 86.84%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.37%
Share count expansion well above OBE's 0.28%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.37%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
30.29%
Dividend growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.59%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
104.11%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
269.41%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
8.50%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-58.41%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
12.78%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5.78%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-47.84%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
48.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-34.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-87.79%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 20.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
47.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-24.78%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OBE stands at 15.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.31%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-69.25%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
81.20%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-82.78%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-65.53%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OBE invests at 49.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-19.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 341.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.58%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.32%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.24%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.91%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 18.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.