PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.89%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
30.11%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
108.64%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
108.64%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
935.79%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
104.86%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
104.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 0.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 0.45%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
1.99%
Dividend growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 1.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if management’s capital return strategy is more aggressive yet sustainable.
-9.26%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 36.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-52.66%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
15.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-40.32%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-3.52%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-17.95%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-73.84%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-48.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
790.84%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
11281.02%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
2224.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-1.96%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OBE stands at 17.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.43%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-43.08%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
41.88%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-82.77%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-65.53%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-0.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.38%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
37.06%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.85%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.