PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-44.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-54.72%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 95.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-96.32%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 87.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-96.32%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 90.03%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-962.12%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 86.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-940.30%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 86.20%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-940.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 86.20%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.25%
Share count expansion well above OBE's 1.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.25%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 1.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-25.67%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 9.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
84.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 30.00%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
57.38%
FCF growth 75-90% of OBE's 72.44%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
-51.03%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-65.61%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-32.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-64.35%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
160.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-24.10%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-5303.17%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-211.83%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13921.41%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-0.16%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-47.77%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
9.13%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
23.02%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-75.11%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-74.88%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-48.24%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 247.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
68.33%
We show growth while OBE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-7.25%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-3.85%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 12.89%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.