PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
58.07%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
163.75%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
206.96%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
206.96%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.23%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.20%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.05%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
2.75%
Dividend growth of 2.75% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
52.01%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 188.06%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
95.51%
FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 55.73%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-66.84%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-52.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
12.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-61.62%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-70.06%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-65.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-573.05%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-278.61%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
13.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-50.44%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-66.09%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
6.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-39.24%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-77.36%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-77.37%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-6.13%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-69.64%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-9.18%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.01%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.51%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.