Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x OBE's 29.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Operating income growth above 1.5x OBE's 29.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.

Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Dividend growth of 16.55% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.

Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.

Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.

Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.