PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.13%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 5.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-45.65%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-134.42%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-134.42%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 18.18%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-200.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-200.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-198.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.86%
Share reduction while OBE is at 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.18%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.92%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
24.67%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.51%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-89.33%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-61.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
5.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-81.09%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-33.13%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
42.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 70.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-109.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 77.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-116.13%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
91.64%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-75.19%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-4.53%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-25.92%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-96.29%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-89.89%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-66.27%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
4.25%
AR growth well above OBE's 0.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.12%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.30%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.88%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 10.35%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
SG&A growth of 32.50% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.