Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 6.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 68.57%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 94.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.

Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.

Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.31% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.