PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.35%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-31.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-108.89%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-108.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-104.03%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-104.13%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-104.05%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.85%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.13%
Dividend growth of 6.13% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-3.44%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 53.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.89%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-60.37%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
25.85%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-69.62%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
59.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
142.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 207.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-100.55%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-101.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 70.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
98.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-65.42%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-41.48%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
7.14%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-90.36%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-71.46%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
18.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.03% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-20.58%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 21.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.98%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.24%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.