PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.91%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 48.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
467.26%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 420.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
62.90%
EBIT growth 50-75% of OBE's 116.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
62.90%
Operating income growth under 50% of OBE's 136.36%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
65.30%
Net income growth at 75-90% of OBE's 81.82%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
65.32%
EPS growth at 75-90% of OBE's 81.87%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
65.32%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of OBE's 81.87%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
321.37%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 1600.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
205.19%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 1712.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-72.18%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-41.29%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-78.91%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-29.56%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
3.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-242.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 85.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
20.35%
Below 50% of OBE's 99.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-487.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 91.36%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-85.78%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-58.07%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-53.19%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.75%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-59.12%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
28.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.42% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-6.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.75%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-25.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.85%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.70%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 83.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.