PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.94%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 19.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-33.60%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 149.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-162.05%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 1414.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-162.05%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 1289.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-166.34%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 1290.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-166.39%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 1253.12%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-168.10%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 1264.52%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.23%
Share reduction while OBE is at 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.84%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.41%
Dividend growth of 4.41% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.31%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 50.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.06%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 1578.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-51.65%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
203.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
25.20%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-55.80%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
489.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 172.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
14.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 304.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-166.10%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
77.75%
Below 50% of OBE's 335.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1.25%
Below 50% of OBE's 425.48%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-86.86%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-47.70%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-55.96%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.35%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
48.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 48.27% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.89%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.89% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.12%
AR growth well above OBE's 16.03%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.28%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 32.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.62%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 90.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-14.82%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 71.70%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.