PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.73%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 12.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.09%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
104.96%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
104.96%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
64.88%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
64.56%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
64.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.91%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.35%
Dividend growth of 49.35% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.27%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 55.21%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.80%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-56.46%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
21.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 7.38%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
5.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 0.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-65.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
191.43%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 164.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-31.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE stands at 46.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-134.36%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-115.16%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 119.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-237.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 244.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-86.88%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-59.33%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-56.57%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-85.59%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
90.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.00% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
96.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 96.33% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.08%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.95%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 2.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.60%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.01%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.