PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
86.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 22.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
224.24%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
23983.33%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
23983.33%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2022.22%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1992.86%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1992.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share change of 0.92% while OBE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.59%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-8.87%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-28.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-23.01%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
168.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 26.25%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 86.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.17%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
145.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 234.62%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-2.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE stands at 220.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
419.26%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 131.32% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
425.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 108.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-1.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 118.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-82.36%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-45.21%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-49.93%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-86.10%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
70.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.10% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
103.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 103.48% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 21.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 7.42%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
32.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 6.49%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.22%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 11.63%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.