PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.33%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.14%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-31.01%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.16%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-31.98%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.09%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.25%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 0.95%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
32.49%
Dividend growth of 32.49% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-22.19%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-58.30%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 179.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-25.11%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
93.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 26.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
261.15%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 197.97%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
-11.46%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
32.40%
Below 50% of OBE's 396.05%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
639.87%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 2884.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-72.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 138.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
268.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 116.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
107.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of OBE's 174.39%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
3.60%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
8.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
65.24%
Below 50% of OBE's 342.71%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-54.90%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
346.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 346.01% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
243.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 243.78% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.07%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
15.60%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
51.54%
Debt growth far above OBE's 6.04%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.06%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.