PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.24%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 18.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 48.04%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-12.05%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 30.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.05%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 30.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
20.83%
Net income growth at 50-75% of OBE's 34.78%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
9.63%
EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 40.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 36.36%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.74%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.17%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-8.95%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
9.03%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 42.03%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-62.30%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 77.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2.67%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
46.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to OBE's 48.91%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
111.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 144.48%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
-47.72%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-28.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is at 97.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
74.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 154.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
16.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
626.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 171.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
125.34%
Below 50% of OBE's 663.29%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-4.80%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
2.66%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
108.34%
Below 50% of OBE's 359.94%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-58.43%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
310.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 310.98% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
226.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.06% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
21.27%
AR growth well above OBE's 18.82%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.95%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-6.57%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 1.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.