PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.64%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.14%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 145.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2020.00%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 107.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4550.00%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 111.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-165.00%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 105.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-165.22%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 105.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-177.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 105.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.59%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.04%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
1.61%
Dividend growth of 1.61% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-14.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.30%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
10.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-10.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OBE stands at 155.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
19.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 14.23%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
5.42%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
53.88%
Below 50% of OBE's 191.04%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.98%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to OBE's 27.33%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
94.58%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 106.05%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-137.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 102.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
34.78%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-38.35%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-1.32%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OBE is at 305.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
112.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 97.51%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
19.47%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
224.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 224.25% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
48.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.27% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.58%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Asset growth at 50-75% of OBE's 2.79%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-0.86%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 8.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.39%
Debt growth far above OBE's 4.23%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 8.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.