PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
79.55%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2863.56%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2863.56%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
66.67%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
67.35%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
67.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
58.98%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
58.98%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
3.87%
Dividend growth of 3.87% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.57%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-33.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-48.53%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.82%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-36.19%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.19%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.08%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VTLE's 51.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.