PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
164.83%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
195.15%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
147.80%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
147.80%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
262.73%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
95.12%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
13.18%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
15.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
104.38%
Dividend growth of 104.38% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
314.66%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-165.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
247.56%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
570.74%
Inventory growth of 570.74% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
212.52%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
193.38%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
250.84%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
731.43%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 51.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.