Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 18.14% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 51.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.