PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.27%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.09%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-37.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-7.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
19.09%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-7.63%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.96%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
54.70%
Dividend growth of 54.70% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-4.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-68.29%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-4.98%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-4.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 20.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-4.98%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
91.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
91.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
91.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
84.33%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 58.99%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
84.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
84.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-5.69%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-5.69%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 73.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-5.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 38.15%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-9.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-9.76%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-9.76%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-17.71%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
52.18%
Inventory growth of 52.18% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.68%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
20.82%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
14.53%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VTLE's 51.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.