PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
2.67%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.38%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4.38%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-63.06%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-63.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-63.20%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.03%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.56%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-51.01%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-15.63%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-565.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-42.08%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-42.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 20.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-42.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.38%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 58.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-33.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 67.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-33.38%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
75.99%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
75.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with VTLE's 73.01%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
75.99%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
59.61%
Inventory growth of 59.61% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.67%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.99%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
13.61%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.69%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 51.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.