PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
54.43%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.28%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
492.56%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
492.56%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
557.39%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
411.11%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
423.22%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
26.55%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
25.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-18.60%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
21.05%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
517.03%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
89.23%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
89.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
89.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
116.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
116.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
116.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2174.66%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2174.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2174.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
147.31%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
147.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
147.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
108.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.99% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
108.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.99% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
108.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 108.99% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-8.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-26.64%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.30%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-6.34%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.55%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-320.40%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 51.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.