PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.92%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.92%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
790.82%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
669.68%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
695.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
16.06%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-13.05%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
185.43%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
359.97%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
96.87%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
96.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
133.35%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
582.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
582.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
739.11%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2356.55%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2356.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1208.71%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
225.79%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
225.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
178.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
242.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 242.32% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
242.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 242.32% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
226.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.57% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-34.82%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-84.84%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.50%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.02%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.02%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 51.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.