PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-38.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-62.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-71.04%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-71.04%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-69.69%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-69.70%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.33%
Dividend growth of 0.33% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-33.19%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-73.31%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
415.69%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
344.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
161.95%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
438.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
372.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-21.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1378.39%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
417.65%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-39.82%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
518.48%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
246.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
89.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
2016.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2016.49% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
5483.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5483.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
518.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 518.27% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-23.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-59.38%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.43%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.83%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.83%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.11%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 51.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.