PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-66.67%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-75.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 0.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.27%
Dividend growth of 0.27% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.77%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
255.33%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
161.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
69.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
9.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
426.71%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
200.57%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-7.17%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-2.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 58.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
17.10%
Below 50% of VTLE's 67.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-87.77%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
248.34%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
160.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
48.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
899.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 899.39% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
701.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 701.10% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
305.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 305.19% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.92%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
32.46%
Inventory growth of 32.46% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.58%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.69%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.34%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.18%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 51.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.