PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.16%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-17.99%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-56.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-89.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-90.63%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-90.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 0.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
37.95%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
55.02%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
65.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
94.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
6.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-90.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 58.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-92.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 67.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-98.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
575.59%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
154.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
45.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
723.35%
Dividend/share CAGR of 723.35% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
303.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 303.91% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.14%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.39%
Inventory growth of 2.39% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.58%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.91%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
59.39%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VTLE's 51.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.