PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-129.30%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
7.42%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
110.61%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
110.61%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2444.00%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2720.00%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2720.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-50.00%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-48.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-58.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-188.26%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-146.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 20.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-134.26%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
266.04%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
69.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-1.09%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
771.98%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-61.67%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 67.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
16.21%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
346.73%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
80.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
14.39%
Below 50% of VTLE's 38.15%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
956.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 956.98% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
405.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 405.76% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
131.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 131.91% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-38.57%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-98.35%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-36.14%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-33.43%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-45.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.41%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 51.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.