PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.14%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 22.98%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
34.16%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 23.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
163.86%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 18.94%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
163.86%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 18.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
125.64%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 779.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
126.42%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 776.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
124.53%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 776.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 13.27%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
75.96%
FCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 30.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
40.92%
10Y CAGR of 40.92% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-41.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-72.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
164.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 164.63% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-53.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-50.87%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-26.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-90.82%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-85.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
148.96%
Equity/share CAGR of 148.96% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
5.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 5.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-16.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
397.82%
Dividend/share CAGR of 397.82% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
101.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-50.10%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.32%
AR growth of 3.32% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Asset growth of 1.81% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
0.44%
BV/share growth of 0.44% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
5.89%
Debt growth of 5.89% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.74%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 13.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.