PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.48%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 0.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.96%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-5.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-31.82%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 41.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.50%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 41.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-31.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 41.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.84%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
198.09%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 120.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-34.07%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 120.27%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-77.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 120.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 116.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-55.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 116.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-52.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 250.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-90.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 250.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 250.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
357.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 357.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-1.47%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-28.54%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.92% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-49.90%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-5.19%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-50.00%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.60%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 12.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.42%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.88%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VTLE's 26.74%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.82%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 72.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.