PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.59%
Revenue growth similar to VTLE's 4.91%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
7.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 1.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-152.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-152.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-305.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.98%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 54.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-21.43%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
94.91%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to VTLE's 90.78%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-24.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 90.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-62.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 90.78%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
198.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 94.23%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-19.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 94.23%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-44.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 94.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-444.10%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-145.86%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-123.28%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
347.81%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 115.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
14.67%
Below 50% of VTLE's 115.60%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-27.59%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 115.60%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
956.80%
Dividend/share CAGR of 956.80% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
131.87%
Dividend/share CAGR of 131.87% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-50.07%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
2.03%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. VTLE's 27.12%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
100.00%
We show growth while VTLE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.16%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 10.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.54%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 102.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.21%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.