PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.59%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 5.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
169.31%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
346.02%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.19%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
346.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
93.57%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 260.18%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
93.61%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 252.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
93.61%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 259.48%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 4.76%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-37.22%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 11.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-117.36%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 46.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTLE's 76.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-71.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 76.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
244.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 76.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
136.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.61%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-66.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 38.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-47.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 38.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-159.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-107.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-112.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
24.14%
Below 50% of VTLE's 99.20%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-74.10%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 99.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-67.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 99.20%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
908.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 908.15% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-0.47%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-0.02%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-4.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 1.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 19.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.11%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 7.52%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.57%
Debt growth far above VTLE's 10.43%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1198.04%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 12.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.