PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-29.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-38.48%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 4.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-75.06%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-75.06%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-74.25%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-74.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-74.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.30%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 5.57%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 5.47%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-1.22%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
68.77%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
445.88%
FCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.29%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
4.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 164.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-86.86%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 164.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-42.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 164.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
55.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 172.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-68.93%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 172.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-29.63%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 172.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
12.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.62%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-69.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-15.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-76.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-68.89%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
717.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 717.34% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-63.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-27.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-14.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
107.58%
We show growth while VTLE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.21%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.67%
Under 50% of VTLE's 29.29%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.50%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 19.08%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.